<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Houston&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.divaknitting.com/blog/2007/05/03/houston/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.divaknitting.com/blog/2007/05/03/houston</link>
	<description>being a diva is great...except for the mostly negative connotation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 00:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.divaknitting.com/blog/2007/05/03/houston/comment-page-1#comment-9262</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.divaknitting.com/blog/?p=349#comment-9262</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never found anyone that liked a yarn meter counter thingy.  Not one ever seems to please the user.  The only good one I&#039;m thinking of was possibly mentioned by Dave Daniels.

I always used the idea of weighing a bit of yarn on a scale that measures very small amounts, like accurate to one gram.  Weigh out 2 grams or 5 maybe.  Then measure it.  Then weigh your skein.  That seems to be the most accurate thing.  Even a niddy noddy doesn&#039;t seem to be very accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never found anyone that liked a yarn meter counter thingy.  Not one ever seems to please the user.  The only good one I&#8217;m thinking of was possibly mentioned by Dave Daniels.</p>
<p>I always used the idea of weighing a bit of yarn on a scale that measures very small amounts, like accurate to one gram.  Weigh out 2 grams or 5 maybe.  Then measure it.  Then weigh your skein.  That seems to be the most accurate thing.  Even a niddy noddy doesn&#8217;t seem to be very accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

